Heterogeneous believes, segregation and extremism in the making of public opinions
نویسنده
چکیده
The connection between contradictory public opinions, heterogeneous believes and the emergence of democratic or dictatorial extremism is studied extending our former two state dynamic opinion model. Agents are attached to a social-cultural class. At each step they are distributed randomly in different groups within their respective class to evolve locally by majority rule. In case of a tie the group adopts either one opinion with respective probabilities k and (1 − k). The value of k accounts for the average of individual biases driven by the existence of heterogeneous believes within the corresponding class. It may vary from class to class. The process leads to extremism with a full polarization of each class along either one opinions. For homogeneous classes the extremism can be along the initial minority making it dictatorial. At contrast heterogeneous classes exhibit a more balanced dynamics which results in a democratic extremism. Segregation among subclasses may produce a coexistence of opinions at the class level thus averting global extremism. The existence of contradictory public opinions in similar social-cultural neighborhoods is given a new light. PACS numbers: 02.50.Ey, 05.40.-a, 89.65.-s, 89.75.-k
منابع مشابه
Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions.
The connection between contradictory public opinions, heterogeneous beliefs, and the emergence of majority- or minority-induced extremism is studied, extending our former two-state dynamic opinion model. Agents are attached to a social-cultural class. At each step they are distributed randomly in different groups within their respective classes to evolve locally by majority rule. In case of a t...
متن کاملThe Distribution of Climate Change Public Opinion in Canada
While climate scientists have developed high resolution data sets on the distribution of climate risks, we still lack comparable data on the local distribution of public climate change opinions. This paper provides the first effort to estimate local climate and energy opinion variability outside the United States. Using a multi-level regression and post-stratification (MRP) approach, we estimat...
متن کاملA middle option for choices in the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions model
Modeling the conditions for the emergence of extremism is a very important problem, with clear applications for describing the interaction among individuals. Traditional models either are not suited for the task, as in the case of discrete models, or, like Bounded Confidence models, are built with rules that make opinions tend to a common ground between agents or not change at all. Continuous O...
متن کاملThe Causes of the Emergence of Islamic Extremism in the Wahhabi Sect and the Tendencies towards it
Extremism is a notion, which becomes meaningful in democratic and lawful societies. This is sometimes interchangeable with the terms, Fundamentalism and terrorism. It is often said that one who aims to fight against terrorism, must first challenge and overcome extremism. Thus, Analysis of the potentials of extremism in a society is highly articulated. Whereas Fundamentalism intends to bring abo...
متن کاملHealth System Governance in Iran: A Delphi Study
Background and Aim: Good governance results in better health outcomes for the society thorugh improving health system performance. The governance of Iran health stsyem faces some challenges. Hence, this study aimed to propose and verify a model for strengthening Iranian health system governance. Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in 2016 using the Delphi method. A heal...
متن کامل